A missing Portuguese national’s identity was used to register a Mozambican timber export company.
By Foreign Correspondent
Américo António Melro Sebastião vanished on the morning of July 29, 2016, at a fuel station in Nhamapadza, in the district of Maringué, province of Sofala, central Mozambique.
Witnesses told his family that uniformed agents handcuffed him and placed him into one of two unmarked vehicles, which drove away.
His abductors used his debit and credit cards to withdraw approximately 4,000 euros before the accounts were frozen, according to family statements reported at the time. His whereabouts have never been established.
On November 15, 2016, the United Nations Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances transmitted a case to the Government of Mozambique under its urgent action procedure, concerning the abduction of Américo António Melro Sebastião.
The UN body later noted its regret at “the absence of information on any investigation” into the case.

In 2018, the Provincial Prosecutor’s Office in Sofala closed the file. Mozambique’s attorney general subsequently revoked that closure, but no arrest has ever been made, and the case remains unresolved.
Nearly a decade after his disappearance, according to documents and claims under review, Américo António Melro Sebastião’s name appears as a registered partner of a company identified as Inther-Beira, reportedly incorporated in 2024 in Mozambique’s commercial registry.
The company is linked to a timber export certificate.
The central investigative question is how a man formally reported to the United Nations as forcibly disappeared, with no confirmed valid identity document, no known address in Mozambique, and no confirmed presence in the country since 2016, could legally qualify as a company partner in a licensing process that requires certified passport copies, proof of residency or corporate compliance, and signed documentation from all partners.
No public response was found in the cited record from Inther-Beira or its other identified shareholders.
Mozambique’s timber licensing regime is extensive on paper. Under the 1999 Forest and Wildlife Law and its 2002 regulation, the National Directorate of Forests and Wildlife, known by its Portuguese acronym, DINAF, holds authority over all forest harvesting licences, export permits, and quota allocations.
The law specifies that all timber exporters must be licensed by the Ministry of Industry and Commerce and must present a phytosanitary certificate issued by DINAF, which is also required to inspect the loading of timber before containers leave port.
For company formation, Mozambique requires certified copies of passports and proof of address for all shareholders and directors, in addition to notarised articles of association filed with the Commercial Registry.

Investment procedure guidelines issued by the country’s investment promotion agency, APIEX, specifically require that foreign investors attach “copies of the investor’s identification documents” and, where a foreign individual is listed, a valid passport copy.
The documents and claims under review raise a specific question: where were those documents for Sebastião, and which official verified them?
The available elements under review suggest that the irregularities converge on decisions taken within the authority of Imede Chafim Falume, who served as Director National of Forests at the now-dissolved Ministry of Land and Environment (MTA) between 2020 and 2022.
In that role, he held broad powers over the licensing of timber exploitation, the authorisation of exports, and inspection mechanisms.
Falume’s tenure was, according to reporting by the independent Mozambican weekly Savana, marked by “institutional failures in oversight, smuggling, and abusive exploitation of forest resources, especially in regions affected by conflict in Cabo Delgado Province.”
Among the specific matters reported: Authorisation No. 2065, bearing his personal signature, allegedly permitted the transport of timber without payment of mandatory felling fees, directly violating forest regulations and state revenue protocols.
The same reporting documented the disappearance of more than 76 timber containers at the port of Pemba during his leadership, followed by his quiet removal from the post.
Despite those findings, Falume was reappointed in May 2025 as National Director of Forests and Wildlife under the new Ministry of Agriculture, Environment and Fisheries, an appointment that Savana reported raised “serious concerns about impunity and corruption in the forestry sector.”
The Ministry of Agriculture, Environment and Fisheries made no public clarification about Falume’s record at the time of his reappointment. No public response was found in the cited record.
Whether the Inther-Beira licensing occurred during Falume’s 2020–2022 mandate or was connected to decisions made within his administrative sphere, or whether a different official bears direct responsibility, could not be independently confirmed from the record available.

The claims under review place the licensing irregularities within his sphere of authority.
The Inther-Beira matter, if confirmed, would not be an isolated case. It fits a pattern of systematic licensing manipulation that international monitors have documented across Mozambique’s forestry sector for more than a decade.
Mozambique loses an estimated half a billion dollars a year to illegal logging, most of it traded with China, according to a 2024 report by the Environmental Investigation Agency.
The same report found that over 89 percent of timber shipped from Mozambique to China between 2017 and 2023, amounting to 3.7 million tonnes, likely violated the country’s national log export ban. Z
Forest Trends’ December 2024 Timber Legality Risk Dashboard assigned Mozambique a risk score of 81.6, placing it in the higher-risk category, citing corruption, bribery, and poor governance as primary drivers.
Transparency International scored the country 26 out of 100 on its Corruption Perceptions Index in 2022, making it the 38th most corrupt country in the world, according to the same dashboard.
The EIA has indicated that forest officers, customs officials, and certain Mozambican parliamentarians are widely implicated in forest crime and illegal timber exports.
The use of a missing or untraceable person’s identity as a nominal company partner would represent a specific form of fraud within that ecosystem: one designed to obscure actual ownership, satisfy regulatory requirements on paper, and concentrate control of export licenses among those with access to official channels.
Sebastião was an agricultural and logging businessman, described in multiple credible reports as someone who was operating near a timber concession area in Sofala at the time of his abduction.
His family’s eight-year pursuit of answers has drawn in the Portuguese presidency, multiple MEPs, and the UN human rights system.
European Parliament member Isabel Santos wrote to the Mozambican president, warning that the “silences and gaps” surrounding the case were “incomprehensible for the family” and that allowing it to fall into oblivion would be “the worst outcome for Mozambique and its reputation”.

If his identity was subsequently used, without consent or legal documentation, to register a timber company and obtain an export certificate, it would constitute a new harm against an unresolved victim.
It would also represent a failure of the same state institutions that were meant to investigate his disappearance.
The regional stakes are direct.
Mozambique’s timber trade primarily flows toward China, with secondary markets in South Africa and the European Union.
Illegally obtained certificates of origin and export permits are the legal facade through which tainted timber enters international supply chains. Importing countries, including EU member states subject to the EU Deforestation Regulation, assume that certificates have been properly verified.
If they have not, the compliance system downstream is compromised.
Illicit timber revenue has also been documented as a financing source for the Islamist insurgency in Cabo Delgado province, which has killed over 6,000 people since 2017 and displaced more than a million others.
Mozambique’s Attorney General revoked the Sofala provincial prosecutor’s closure of the Sebastião case in 2019, acknowledging that the investigation had been prematurely terminated.
Former President Filipe Nyusi told a press conference in Lisbon that year that the disappearance was “not a matter of state” while also saying his government had “done everything” to clarify the case.
No arrest has been made. Nobody has been found. No formal conclusion has been reached.
The Gabinete Central de Combate à Corrupção, Mozambique’s central anti-corruption agency, and the Attorney General’s Office have not publicly acknowledged any investigation into the Inther-Beira registration or into the licensing process connected to it.
No public response was found in the cited record from DINAF, the Ministry of Agriculture, or the Commercial Registry on the question of how Sebastião’s name was accepted as a partner document.
For forest governance analysts, the unresolved combination of an unaccounted disappearance, a company registration bearing that person’s name, and an export certificate issued under disputed authority represents precisely the kind of institutional opacity they have warned about.
“The system of licences, permits and taxes that governs the production, transport and export of timber in Mozambique is perfectly adequate to ensure timber legality,” the Forest Governance and Policy risk tool states, “but is not well enforced.”
Eight years after Américo Sebastião disappeared into the back of a van in Sofala, his name, according to the documents and claims under review, was doing active work inside that system.