Beneath the court filings and political deals lies a deeper story of inheritance, expectation, and a democracy still fighting for its soul.
By Collins Mtika
When Enoch Kamzingeni Chihana was sworn in as Malawi’s Second Vice President on October 20, 2025, at Sanjika Palace, the symbolism was clear.
Deputy Chief Justice Lovemore Chikopa presided, giving Chihana the same position his father held about 30 years earlier.
But while he rose to high office, a very different story was unfolding in the Lilongwe’s Chief Resident Magistrate’s Court in Lilongwe: allegations of bribery, political interference, and attempts to influence Malawi’s fuel procurement system.
A democratic heir now stood accused of weakening the very institutions his father helped build.
Born in 1962 in Rumphi District, Enoch Chihana grew up under the influence of his father, Chakufwa Chihana, the trade unionist who ended Malawi’s one-party rule and became Second Vice President in the multiparty era.
Little is known publicly about Enoch’s early life. He built a business career before winning the Rumphi Central parliamentary seat in 2012.
His claimed legal background is poorly documented.
As Minister of Sports and Youth Development under Joyce Banda (2012–2014), he left behind few controversies, and few achievements.
Those who followed his rise saw strategy, not ideology. In Malawi’s politics, he learned that alliances often matter more than beliefs.
In 2013, Chihana became AFORD president. His election, marked by walkouts and a suspended convention, was upheld by the High Court in 2014.
But the party never healed, and his leadership style became clear: legally solid, politically divisive.
From then on, he became a major dealmaker:
- He supported Saulos Chilima in 2014 and 2019.
- He sided with the MCP in 2020, helping Lazarus Chakwera win.
- He moved to the DPP in 2025, helping Peter Mutharika secure a strong northern vote.
His decisions reflected calculation, not consistent ideology.
In August 2021, Chihana’s political maneuvering clashed with the law. The Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) arrested him, former Energy Minister Newton Kambala, and former presidential adviser Chris Chaima Banda for allegedly interfering with Nocma’s 2020/21 fuel procurement tender.
In court, Nocma former acting CEO Helen Buluma presented a detailed account:
- Kambala allegedly offered her USD 500,000 to award contracts to Trafigura, Finergy, and O’Lakes Energy.
- Chihana allegedly arranged a meeting between Finergy and Nocma officials at Ufulu Gardens.
- Buluma provided recordings and messages showing continued pressure to influence the tender.
When threats arose to suspend the process, the Nocma board voted to continue, insisting on independence.
The case has dragged on for four years. By February 2025, the State had closed its case, with an ACB investigator stating that interference had been “established.”
The defence argues that because former President Chakwera met the same suppliers and demanded proper procedure, lower-level contacts cannot be considered conspiracy or bribery.
They also tried, unsuccessfully, to have Chihana discharged in 2023.
In March 2025, a different scandal emerged. Chihana’s sister, Tawonga Kayira, accused him online of selling her land without consent and taking K20 million.
Chihana said he followed procedure but did not clearly explain whether he refunded her after the deal collapsed.
Though separate from the Nocma case, the issue raised similar concerns about blurred lines between personal and public dealings.
On October 5, 2025, while the court awaited defence witnesses, President Peter Mutharika appointed Chihana Second Vice President. Legally, the appointment is allowed. Politically, it caused debate.
Section 80(5) lets the president appoint a second vice president “in the national interest.” The Malawi Law Society confirmed its legality. But critics noted that the position has no defined duties.
Chihana himself said only, “It is the President’s prerogative.”
Analysts saw the appointment as a political reward rather than a governance need. Many questioned how someone on trial for corruption could be elevated before the case concluded.
Chihana’s rise mixes legacy, strategy, and political usefulness. His father earned the vice presidency through democratic struggle. He gained it through political calculations.
Meanwhile, the case against Chihana hinges on key questions:
- Did arranging meetings and applying pressure amount to criminal interference?
- Does the president’s involvement with suppliers protect subordinates from conspiracy charges?
- And where is the line between political advocacy and procurement manipulation?
These answers will determine his fate and test Malawi’s democratic strength.
Enoch Chihana stands at a point between history and judgement. He has inherited his father’s office, but not his moral clarity. Democracies depend on leaders who protect institutions, not weaken them.
As Malawi elevates a man still on trial, the country faces a serious question: Can a democracy grow while rewarding those accused of undermining it?
The courtroom waits. So, does the nation.